Oslo, Norway – The Norwegian government has announced a temporary halt to its deep-sea mining ambitions following political pressure from environmental groups and the Socialist Left Party (SV). The decision means no exploration licenses will be issued in 2024 or 2025, despite earlier plans to allow seabed extraction in the Arctic.
Norway, a leader in offshore energy and marine industries, had been exploring deep-sea mining as a potential revenue source, particularly given the growing demand for critical minerals used in renewable energy technologies. However, environmentalists and marine scientists have raised concerns over the ecological risks of disturbing the seabed, which could have long-term consequences on marine biodiversity.
SV, which provides critical support for Norway’s minority government, made halting deep-sea mining a key condition for its continued backing. While the government will proceed with preparatory studies, including regulatory frameworks and environmental impact assessments, the pause represents a significant setback for companies eager to exploit underwater mineral resources.
Environmental groups such as Greenpeace Nordic hailed the decision as a victory, emphasizing the lack of scientific data on the consequences of disturbing fragile deep-sea ecosystems. Some marine scientists argue that ecosystems found in these deep-sea environments develop over thousands of years and could be irreversibly damaged by mining operations.
The pause places Norway in a broader international debate about the future of deep-sea mining. Several countries, including France and Germany, have called for a moratorium on such activities, while the International Seabed Authority (ISA) continues discussions on regulatory frameworks.
Despite the suspension, industry stakeholders remain hopeful that further research will lead to a more sustainable approach to deep-sea resource extraction. For now, however, Norway has chosen caution over commercial ambition, aligning itself with growing global concerns about protecting the ocean’s biodiversity.
Comments