In a significant geopolitical move, Panama has officially withdrawn from China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in 2024, signaling a shift in Latin America’s economic and diplomatic landscape. While China’s BRI promised major infrastructure investments, concerns over debt dependency, lack of transparency, and Beijing’s expanding influence have led many nations, including Panama, to reconsider their participation.
What is the Belt and Road Initiative?
Launched in 2013 by Chinese President Xi Jinping, the Belt and Road Initiative was marketed as a global development strategy to enhance trade and infrastructure across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The plan aimed to connect China with Europe, the Middle East, and beyond through a vast network of roads, railways, ports, and energy projects.
However, beneath its grand ambitions, BRI has faced widespread criticism for its aggressive lending practices, lack of financial sustainability, and hidden political motives. Many partner countries, especially in Africa and South Asia, have struggled under the weight of Chinese debt, with some being forced to hand over critical infrastructure to Beijing in what critics call debt-trap diplomacy.
Why Did Panama Join and Then Leave?
Panama initially joined the Belt and Road Initiative in 2017, shortly after severing diplomatic ties with Taiwan in favor of China. Beijing promised massive investments in ports, roads, and telecommunications, positioning Panama as a strategic gateway between Asia and the Americas. However, over the years, it became evident that China’s investment model came with strings attached.
In 2024, Panama’s new administration withdrew from the BRI, citing:
- Debt Risks: Many BRI projects worldwide have left nations burdened with unpayable loans, raising concerns about Panama’s financial sovereignty.
- Strategic Realignment: The United States remains Panama’s largest economic partner, and aligning too closely with China risked undermining its historic ties with Washington.
- Security and Transparency Concerns: China’s growing influence over critical infrastructure, such as ports and telecommunications, raised national security concerns, particularly regarding surveillance and potential military use of commercial projects.
The United States, a long-time ally of Panama, has long warned about China’s predatory lending practices and strategic ambitions in Latin America. Over the past year, Washington has strengthened economic and security ties with Panama, offering alternative investment frameworks that do not burden the country with excessive debt.
Programs like Build Back Better World (B3W) and Inter-American Development Bank funding provide Latin American nations with sustainable financing models that focus on transparent, debt-free growth, unlike China’s opaque and politically motivated agreements.
Additionally, U.S. trade and security partnerships ensure that Panama’s most critical asset—the Panama Canal—remains free from foreign control or coercion. This is crucial given China’s growing attempts to influence strategic maritime routes worldwide.
A Warning to Other Nations?
Panama’s exit from the BRI reflects a growing global skepticism about China’s true intentions behind its infrastructure deals. Nations such as Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Zambia have already felt the economic squeeze of their China-backed projects, struggling with unsustainable debt while Beijing takes control of ports, highways, and energy plants.
By stepping away from the BRI, Panama is setting a precedent for other Latin American nations to rethink their engagements with China. The move highlights a clear preference for partnerships based on transparency, economic stability, and long-term national interests—principles that align more closely with the United States than Beijing’s authoritarian model.
Panama’s decision to withdraw from China’s Belt and Road Initiative is not just about infrastructure—it is about sovereignty, economic security, and the balance of global power. While China continues its push for influence through massive debt-driven projects, nations like Panama are waking up to the risks of over-reliance on Beijing’s funding.
With the U.S. strengthening its presence in Latin America, countries now have a viable alternative to China’s debt-laden investment model. Panama’s exit from the BRI is a warning sign—nations must be cautious of projects that promise quick money but ultimately threaten their economic and political independence.
Comentarios