top of page

Eco-Friendly Maritime Materials and Circular Supply Models

Overview: U.S. shipyards are increasingly focusing on sustainable materials and circular economy practices to reduce the environmental impact of ship construction and maintenance. Since steel and other traditional materials carry a heavy carbon footprint, the industry is exploring low-emission alternatives, greater use of recycled content, and innovative materials like biocomposites. In parallel, circular models – reusing and recycling components at end-of-life – are being pursued to close the loop on resources.


Low-Emission Steel and Recycled Metals


Steel comprises the bulk of a ship’s structure (roughly 75–80% of a vessel’s weight), making its production a major factor in lifecycle emissions . The steel industry accounts for 7–9% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions – more than twice the direct emissions from ships’ fuel use . To curb this footprint, shipbuilders and suppliers are pivoting to “green steel” and recycled metal inputs:

  • Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) Steel: Unlike traditional coal-fired blast furnaces, EAF mills melt scrap steel using electricity, significantly cutting CO₂ output. U.S. Steel’s “verdeX” product line, for example, uses up to 90% recycled scrap and can reduce carbon emissions by 75% relative to conventional steel . Such low-carbon steel is poised to fortify future ship hulls and infrastructure while meeting stringent climate goals .

  • Hydrogen-Reduced Iron: Pilot projects in Europe (e.g. SSAB in Sweden) use green hydrogen instead of coal to produce iron, yielding fossil-free steel. Early adopters in shipbuilding are eyeing these materials; in fact, shipping giant Maersk has committed to use 50% “low-emission steel” by 2030 and chart a path to 100% net-zero steel by 2040 .

  • Maximizing Recycled Content: Steel is infinitely recyclable, and the maritime sector generates a stream of scrap from retired ships. Most steel from scrapped vessels is recycled as high-quality scrap for new production . Initiatives encourage routing this scrap into new ship plates – a circular loop. However, logistical gaps exist (many ships are scrapped in South Asia while new builds occur elsewhere) , so the emphasis is on using local scrap to avoid emissions from long-distance transport . Increasing recycled content in new builds directly cuts embodied emissions and reduces the need for virgin metal.

  • Recycled Aluminum & Copper: Beyond steel, shipyards are substituting or reusing other metals. Aluminum, when derived from recycled sources, offers lightweight strength with a fraction of the carbon footprint. For instance, recycled aluminum in shipping containers provides durability comparable to steel while improving fuel efficiency due to lighter weight . Copper from old wiring and components can be recovered and recirculated for new installations, reducing mining impacts.


These efforts align with broader trends: the Sustainable Shipping Initiative (SSI) has highlighted that decarbonizing ship construction is as critical as decarbonizing fuels, given steel’s outsized impact on lifecycle emissions . By sourcing greener metals domestically (or from allied low-carbon producers) and investing in mini-mills and recycling facilities, U.S. shipbuilders strengthen supply chain independence and sustainability in tandem.


Bio-Based Composites and Innovative Materials


Beyond metals, advanced composite materials are gaining traction for certain ship components, offering both performance and environmental benefits. Traditionally, ship superstructures, interior panels, and smaller vessels use composites (fiber-reinforced plastics) for their high strength-to-weight ratio. Now, R&D is delivering bio-based and lower-impact composites for maritime use:

  • Natural Fiber Composites: Fibers derived from flax, hemp, or bamboo are being used to reinforce polymers as an alternative to purely synthetic (glass or carbon) fibers. These bio-based composites can significantly cut material carbon footprints and even enable biodegradability at end-of-life . For example, flax fiber laminates infuse into ship decking or interior structures, reducing reliance on petrochemical fibers. Early trials have shown such natural fibers can blend into existing fabrication processes without sacrificing required strength .

  • Resins and Bio-Plastics: Manufacturers are developing epoxy and resin systems from renewable sources (such as plant oils) to replace conventional resins. Fire-resistant biopolymers are also under development in collaboration with the U.S. Navy – aiming to meet strict fire safety standards for interior applications while minimizing toxic additives . These materials, once matured, could be used in bulkheads, furnishings, or even hull components on smaller craft.

  • Lightweight Composite Structures: Weight reduction is a key sustainability strategy (lighter ships consume less fuel). Modern composite materials like advanced fiberglass and carbon fiber (while not bio-based, but often recyclable) are used in high-speed ferries, patrol craft, and yacht hulls. Their contribution to efficiency is notable: every ton of weight saved translates to fuel savings and lower emissions. Carbon fiber in particular, though energy-intensive to produce, offers lifecycle gains by enabling substantially lower operational fuel burn. Coupled with emerging recyclable composite technologies (solvent-based recycling of epoxy, thermoplastic composites that can be remolded), the aim is to prevent composite waste and make these materials part of a circular system.

  • Marine-Grade Timber: In a surprising revival, sustainably sourced wood is being reconsidered for certain marine applications. Marine-grade lumber, harvested from FSC-certified forests, is rot-resistant and high-strength . It’s used in decking, interiors, and even structural elements on eco-minded projects. Because it’s lighter than metal and sequesters carbon, it can lower a vessel’s overall material impact . Modern treatments and laminating techniques give wood-based composites durability in harsh marine environments. This throwback material, when sourced responsibly, aligns with circular principles (renewable and eventually biodegradable) and is gaining interest for niche use in green shipbuilding.


Several companies are spearheading innovation in green marine materials. Gurit and Magnum Venus Products are exploring recyclable composite tech; Cambium Biomaterials (US) in partnership with the Navy is developing bio-based fire-safe composites ; paint giants like AkzoNobel and PPG have launched low-VOC, biocide-free coatings lines; and major steelmakers (U.S. Steel, Nucor) are investing in electric furnace and green hydrogen steel pilot projects domestically. These collaborations between material suppliers and shipyards are critical to accelerate adoption of eco-friendly materials.


Green Coatings and Low-Toxicity Paints


Coatings and paints are essential to ship construction – for corrosion protection and antifouling – but they traditionally involve toxic substances and solvents. Sustainability efforts target both the composition of coatings and their performance (to ensure longevity and fuel-saving properties):

  • Low-VOC, Water-Based Paints: Shipyards are switching to paints with minimal volatile organic compounds (VOCs) to improve worker safety and air quality. Water-based epoxies and urethanes are being used for interior and topside coatings, cutting hazardous emissions without sacrificing protection. For example, some yard primers and anti-corrosion coatings now meet “Green Seal” standards for VOC content, aligning with EPA guidelines.

  • Biocide-Free Antifouling Coatings: A major environmental concern has been antifouling hull paints that leach copper or other biocides into the ocean (to prevent marine growth). While these paints reduce drag (and thus save fuel) , they can harm marine life and contaminate sediments . In response, companies are developing foul-release coatings – typically silicone or fluoropolymer based – that create a slick surface so organisms cannot easily attach, without releasing toxins. These coatings, used on some Navy and commercial ships, reduce biofouling and can improve fuel efficiency by ~5-8% while being far more benign to ecosystems. Research is also underway on zwitterionic polymers and other advanced materials that resist fouling through surface chemistry rather than toxicity .

  • Durable, Longer-Life Finishes: Extending the lifespan of paint means fewer repainting cycles (which involve material and solvent use). Advanced polysiloxane paints for hulls, for instance, can last 50% longer than traditional epoxy systems, reducing maintenance frequency. Some contain nano-additives that improve hardness and corrosion resistance, delaying repaint needs. Longer intervals between drydock paint jobs not only save costs but also reduce waste (old paint removal debris) over a ship’s life.

  • Thermal Spray Coatings & Alternatives: In lieu of solvent-based paint, thermal metal spraying (e.g. aluminum spraying for corrosion protection) is sometimes used – it involves no organic chemicals. Shipyards implementing this report lower emissions and very durable results on steel surfaces (like ballast tanks). Similarly, powder coating for smaller components (where feasible) eliminates solvents entirely by using heat-cured powder resin.


Manufacturers like Hempel, Jotun, and Sherwin-Williams have introduced “next generation” marine coatings that align with environmental regulations (like the IMO’s ban on certain biocides) and contribute to efficiency. The U.S. Navy as well has funded development of non-toxic antifouling solutions, recognizing the dual benefit of protecting ships and seas. By choosing coatings that reduce drag and last longer, shipyards support both operational efficiency (fuel savings) and environmental stewardship.


Circular Economy in Shipbuilding


Circular economy principles – reduce, reuse, recycle – are being integrated into the shipbuilding supply chain to curb waste and keep materials in use longer. Unlike the traditional linear model (build, use, dispose), circular strategies in maritime focus on designing ships for longevity and end-of-life recoverability:

  • Design for Disassembly and Reuse: Naval architects and yard engineers are considering how components can be more easily removed, refurbished, or upgraded over a ship’s life. Modular construction is one approach: key blocks or systems of a ship (engines, accommodation modules, electronics) are built to be swapped out without scrapping the entire vessel . This extends the useful life of the overall ship and allows modernizing parts of it with less waste. For instance, some cruise ships now have prefabricated cabin modules that can be retrofitted to update interiors instead of scrapping whole sections.

  • Reuse of Components: When ships are decommissioned, not everything is scrapped. There is growing effort to harvest usable components – generators, winches, valves, even sections of steel – for re-use or remanufacturing. Specialized firms evaluate retired vessels for parts that can be refurbished to as-new condition. A notable example is the reuse of naval ship machinery: in some cases, components from a retired Navy ship are overhauled and installed on a new ship or used as training spares, saving cost and material production.

  • Recycling and Upcycling: Steel recycling from ships is already common (as mentioned, almost all steel gets recycled). Now the push is to ensure other materials are recycled: copper wiring is stripped and recycled, plastics from cabins are sorted, and even glass from portholes can be recycled. Some shipyards partner with recyclers to upcycle scrap into new products – for example, teak decking removed during a refit might be repurposed for furniture. Circular supply models mean that materials from the end-of-life stage re-enter the supply chain as inputs for new manufacturing, ideally for new ships. One challenge remains closing the loop geographically, but domestic ship recycling (for government and Jones Act vessels) provides local scrap that can go into domestic steelmaking for new ships .

  • Waste-to-Resource Initiatives: Shipyards generate significant waste during construction (scrap metal offcuts, sawdust, used abrasives, packaging, etc.). Leading yards have adopted aggressive recycling programs on-site. For example, Newport News Shipbuilding (VA) has achieved reusing or recycling roughly half of its waste stream by weight through initiatives like recycling blasting grit and welding slag into concrete additives, and composting bio-waste from yard canteens. Such practices not only divert waste from landfills but can reduce procurement of raw materials (closing loops internally).


Circular economy thinking is also influencing procurement contracts. Instead of just selling a product, some suppliers consider service-based models (as Lloyd’s Register experts suggest). For instance, a maker of ship air conditioners might lease the system to a shipyard with a contract to take back and refurbish units after 10 years, ensuring the materials are recovered and updated models installed – a win-win that guarantees reuse. This kind of product-as-service model is nascent in maritime but aligns incentives for longevity and recycling.


Industry initiatives underpinning circularity include the Sustainable Shipping Initiative (SSI) working group on ship recycling and lifecycle, which advocates for policies to enable closed-loop use of ship materials . Additionally, classification societies (ABS, DNV) have issued guidelines on designing ships for recycling and require an Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM) to be prepared for new vessels to streamline safe dismantling. Such steps ensure from the early design stage, materials can be identified and recovered at end-of-life, supporting a more circular supply chain.


Outlook: Adopting eco-friendly materials and circular supply models in U.S. shipyards presents challenges – from verifying new materials’ performance to reorganizing supply chains – but the trajectory is set. Market demand and regulations are increasingly favoring ships built with a smaller material footprint. Companies pioneering green steel, biocomposites, and non-toxic coatings are becoming key partners for shipbuilders, ensuring that sustainability runs through the entire supply chain of ship production. In the long run, these practices reduce waste, lower emissions, and can even save costs (through energy savings and materials reuse) . By embracing both high-tech innovations and rediscovered materials (like timber), U.S. shipyards are steering the industry toward a circular, low-carbon future for maritime construction.


Comments


bottom of page