Vessel detentions under various Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) worldwide continue to be a significant issue for shipowners, operators, and flag states. Port State Control (PSC) regimes, including the Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, Indian Ocean MOU, and Black Sea MOU, conduct inspections to ensure vessels comply with international safety, security, and environmental regulations. Non-compliant vessels face detention, leading to financial losses, operational delays, and reputational damage.
Recent reports indicate an increase in detentions of older ships, particularly bulk carriers and general cargo vessels over 20 years old. Many of these vessels operate under substandard conditions due to aging equipment, lack of proper maintenance, and insufficient crew training. Flag states with a reputation for weak oversight often see higher detention rates for their fleets.
Certain regions have become focal points for vessel detentions due to strict enforcement of maritime regulations. In Europe, particularly in ports in the Netherlands, Germany, and France, inspections have intensified for vessels with previous non-compliance records. In the Asia-Pacific region, China, Australia, and South Korea have increased scrutiny on foreign-flagged ships, particularly for MARPOL and SOLAS compliance checks. In the Indian Ocean region, ports in India and the UAE frequently report detentions related to expired certification and crew welfare violations. Meanwhile, the Black Sea region, particularly ports in Turkey, Romania, and Bulgaria, continue to detain vessels with structural and operational deficiencies.
The implementation of stricter decarbonization rules, including the Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) and Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI), has led to a surge in detentions for environmental non-compliance. Ships failing to meet IMO’s emissions targets or using improper fuel switching procedures have faced penalties, particularly in European ports. Crew-related issues have also become a significant cause of detentions, with deficiencies such as insufficient training, lack of proper certification, and fatigue due to improper crew rotations being cited.
Annual rankings under the Paris and Tokyo MOUs highlight disparities in flag state performance. Well-regarded registries such as Singapore and Norway maintain lower detention rates, while flags of convenience with weak oversight face higher scrutiny.
Common issues leading to detentions include structural and equipment deficiencies such as hull corrosion, non-functioning emergency generators, and faulty fire suppression systems. Poor implementation of Safety Management Systems (SMS) and missing or outdated certificates have also resulted in detentions. Additionally, pollution violations, such as improper fuel sulfur content levels and illegal bilge water discharge, continue to be major causes of enforcement actions.
Crew welfare concerns, including unpaid wages, poor living conditions, and lack of medical care, are also among the primary reasons vessels are detained. Navigation and communication failures, such as faulty ECDIS systems and expired navigational charts, have similarly contributed to growing detention rates.
To reduce the risk of detentions, shipowners and operators must take proactive steps to ensure compliance with PSC regulations. Conducting internal audits before entering high-risk PSC regions, providing crew members with comprehensive training, and adopting predictive maintenance strategies can help address deficiencies before they lead to detentions. Registering vessels under reputable flag states with strong oversight, as well as using digital compliance tools to track certificates and maintenance schedules, can further mitigate risks.
Vessel detentions under various MOUs remain a significant challenge for the global shipping industry. As PSC inspections become more stringent, shipowners and operators must prioritize compliance with international maritime regulations to avoid costly detentions and reputational damage. Addressing deficiencies proactively, investing in crew training, and ensuring environmental compliance will be critical in navigating the evolving regulatory landscape.
Comments